When it comes to in-cabin monitoring systems, is validation the same thing for all stakeholders in the lifecycle?
How can you ensure that in-cabin monitoring systems comply with requirements during development and integration and at the same time comply with regulations at the end of the process? Do you have the final user in mind when you validate the system in different stages? Are we any closer to some kind of standardization? Can we cover all in-cabin use cases, including different types of sensors?
We want to answer all of these and other questions from the validation data perspective. The importance of validation data generation pipeline to cover all test cases and ensure consistency in all stages and go beyond regulations ensuring quality that will improve user adoption