Engineers designing in-cabin systems face a complex challenge: creating interfaces that drivers not only understand, but trust. As vehicles become increasingly automated, clear communication between vehicle and driver becomes essential, particularly when responsibility shifts between human and machine. In this piece, Dave Mitropoulos-Rundus explores the importance of clarity in alerts and messaging, the psychological factors often overlooked in interface design, and why real-world usability testing across the entire in-cabin environment is critical to building systems that drivers can rely on.
Written by
Dave Mitropoulos-Rundus
Human Factors Specialist
What key elements make in-cabin interfaces feel trustworthy to end users, and where are we seeing confusion or mistrust today?
Drivers want and need, at all times, to know which aspects of driving they are responsible for and which are being handled automatically. When the alerts and messaging are clear and well-defined, drivers are most likely to have the highest level of confidence and trust. Whenever it is unclear, drivers are likely to be confused and lose trust. It is imperative that we achieve the clearest and best designs, and this can be accomplished by applying standards, ongoing research finding and usability testing results to what we are designing.
It is important to understand that there will be drivers who may get used to automated features and expect them to work in all situations. Whenever these automated features do not work, we can expect that this group of drivers may not understand or consider it acceptable, and they may lose trust. This lack of understanding and trust may occur even with our best design efforts to inform them with alerts and messaging. Even for this group, we must remain focused on continuing to do our highest level of design work, and conduct usability testing of what we are designing to ensure maximum understanding and performance by our drivers.
How might in-cabin interfaces need to adapt as automation levels increase?
As automation levels increase, it is important to understand that drivers will become increasingly disengaged. In-cabin interfaces will need to be designed to ensure the driver is adequately alerted on those occasions when they need to re-engage in the task of driving. In addition to alerts, drivers will need to be properly reoriented and also informed on what they need to attend to.
What psychological factors are most often overlooked by engineers when designing these systems?
Engineers are often focused on their ‘part’ of the vehicle they are designing, and it is often difficult for them to consider the entire in-cabin environment. For example, when designing a cluster interface, it is difficult to also be considering where the driver may be looking, what information may also be being displayed in the infotainment system or in a side-view mirror at the same time. Usability testing of a single component (e.g., Cluster, Infotainment System, HVAC, HUD), in context with other components, is the most effective way to quickly identify design changes and improvements that will ensure each component’s design is optimized for driver success.
Design decisions for controls and displays are often made and tested while interacting with them directly and without competing controls and displays. Although this often results in beautiful and professional controls and displays, they will sometimes be less effectively utilized upon implementation.
Why are forums like AutoSens and/or InCabin so important for the industry?
They help inform the industry of emerging and newly available technologies to consider for their vehicles. Without such forums, many potential opportunities can be missed.
They provide an opportunity for discussion of common challenges and potential solutions.
Interested in exterior vehicle sensing technology?
With a pass to InCabin USA, you’ll also get full access to our co-located sister event, AutoSens. Find out more here >>
